Why does the U. Why does the United States have an Electoral College when it would be so easy to directly elect a president, as we do for all the other political offices? The number of electors in each state is the sum of its U. The District of Columbia has three electoral votes, which is the number of senators and representatives it would have if it were permitted representation in Congress.
What Were the Intentions of the Framers of the Constitution? By James Withers Delegates to the Constitutional Convention of advanced competing plans of government as they endeavored to establish the U.
Questions involving the original intent of the framers of the Constitution have been raised ever since the U. As they sought to determine the key principles set forth in the Constitution, the framers tried to balance federalist concerns with state-specific interests.
Revision Delegates to the Constitutional Convention of met for the purpose of revising an earlier plan of government called the Articles of Confederation.
This prior document denied the national government the power of taxation. It did not provide for a system of national courts and it deprived the federal government of the ability to enforce laws. Thus, it was deemed insufficient. The Convention of and the First Congress.
Cohesion Artful acts of compromise characterized the efforts of the framers of the Constitution. A crucial compromise contained in the Constitution dealt with the issue of slavery.
The intent of the Framers could not be clearer: matters of war and peace were for Congress to decide. What a wonderful irony lies in that fact. For today a school of conservative lawyers and politicians argues that in applying our fundamental law we must follow ''the original intent of the Framers.''. Original intent is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation. If you are a textualist, you don't care about the intent, and I don't care if the framers of the Constitution had some secret meaning in mind when they adopted its words.") ^ Cf. Intent of the Framers In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights.
Despite the fact the U. Census of indicates that northern states had effectively abolished slavery, southern states were reticent to accept any plan of government that failed to maintain the institution of slavery.
Leaders from both the North and the South ironed out compromises for the sake of promoting national unity.
|"Original Intent or How Does the Constitution Mean?" by Andreas Teuber||Reproduced in the Senate Reportpg.|
Thus, the framers approved of Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which maintained that the slave trade would not be abolished prior to the year Representation Central to a constitutional plan of representative democracy are reasonable measures of taxation.
Such measures occupied the attention of the framers of the Constitution. Eventually, federal and state interests were assuaged through the adoption of a system of checks and balances.
The South gained a victory by receiving increased congressional recognition on the basis of its slave population, each member of which was counted as three-fifths of a person rather than as a non-entity.
At the same time, the North benefited from this three-fifths provision, since taxes levied on the South accounted for the presence of the slave population. Limitation While many people may argue that the Constitution was written by federalists to reinforce federalist aims, this document is also replete with many limitations upon federal power.
In their book "Constitutional Government: The American Experience," James A.The overriding purpose of the Framers in guaranteeing the right of the people to keep and bear arms was as a check on the standing army, which the Constitution gave the Congress the power to "raise and support.".
The Framers of the Constitution Advertisement William Pierce, of Georgia, spoke very little at the Constitutional Convention, but his contributions to what we know of .
Original intent may fall afoul of formalist theories of law, which explicitly decline interest in how a law is made, an inquiry which is obviously at the core of an original intent inquiry.
Original intent cannot be reconciled against Textualism. Asking about the Framers' intent is, of course, not the only way to interpret the Constitution. Indeed it is possible to identify five, although not always completely distinct, ways the Constitution has been interpreted during the history of judicial review: 1.
Arguments about Framers' Intent.
2. The Reason for the Electoral College. By Joe Miller. Posted on February 11, Q: Why does the U.S.
have an Electoral College? A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy. Aug 09, · The subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the framers.
By Meagan Day and Bhaskar Sunkara Ms. Day is a staff writer at Jacobin, where Mr. Sunkara is editor.