Pay only for approved parts Religion Comparison Essay Sample:
Calvinists Lutherans; neoevangelicals We can freely draw on different approaches depending on the situation in which we find ourselves In practice it is not always easy to place apologists neatly into any one methodology as many use different approaches depending on the question at hand.
It is probably best to see these approaches as tools in a toolkit or weapons in an armoury. We can freely draw on different approaches depending on the situation in which we find ourselves. We will return to this idea in the section entitled The dynamic of apologetic dialogue.
Common Objections to the Task of Apologetics Christians who are sceptical about the value of apologetics raise a number of different objections, some based on verses from the Bible and others based on limitations of logic and apologetics.
These objections are generally based on misunderstandings of the Bible text or of the purpose of apologetics.
In the list of objections that follows I am indebted to Norman Geisler  although I have made some changes to his list and have significantly modified his responses: A Objections from the Bible 1. The Bible does not need to be defended Verses such as Hebrews 4: It is sometimes said that the Bible is like a lion — it does not need to be defended but unleashed.
It is true that Scripture is powerful to change attitudes and challenge hearts, but if someone Apologetics research paper not read or listen seriously to it then it cannot do this work.
Apologetics can establish the fact that it is reasonable to take the Bible seriously, so opening people to be prepared to listen. Furthermore, if Scripture only needed to be unleashed to do its work then the task of teaching and preaching would also be unnecessary and evangelism would be reduced to merely passing on texts from the Bible.
And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? God cannot be known by human reason 1 Corinthians 1: It is claimed that this means there is no point in trying to get people to accept rational arguments for God.
The context of 1 Corinthians 1, however, is not the existence of God but the acceptance of the message of the cross. That message cannot be accepted by natural reason alone — it only makes sense because of the special revelation of Scripture and as the Spirit enlightens 1 Corinthians 2: Elsewhere, however, Paul writes of evidence in nature pointing to the existence of God and some of His attributes, leaving people without excuse Romans 2: It is argued that there is no point, therefore, in trying to explain them to him.
Non-believers reject the gospel not because it is illogical and they cannot understand what it means but because they refuse to accept its claims over them.
In fact, a prayerful approach to apologetics recognises that the work of the Spirit is necessary for people to receive the truth. Without faith one cannot please God Hebrews This claim sets up a false division between faith and reason.
Biblical faith is not blind belief in spite of the evidence, but trust in something that has been commended to the person as trustworthy. The gospel is a message from God that claims that He can be trusted, and apologetics provides evidence that supports that claim.
Faith is a response on the part of the individual that accepts the claim or, rather, accepts the one of whom it speaks and places confidence in it or, more correctly, in Him rather than in self or any alternative.
Jesus refused to give signs to evil men This claim arises from Matthew However, in the next verse Jesus says that one sign, the sign of Jonah, meaning His resurrection, would be given. On occasions He refused to do miracles for entertainment Luke Do not answer a fool according to his folly Proverbs Apologetics is not used in the Bible If this claim is meant to say that Scripture provides no examples of God providing evidence to support faith then it is simply wrong.
Geisler points to the miracles of Moses Exodus 4: The Bible, therefore, provides clear precedents for the task of apologetics even if it does not contain the kind of detailed arguments necessary in modern apologetics since it was written in a pre-modern world primarily to believers.
Apologetics today continues patterns found in Scripture.Apologetics in Theology Apologetics in Christian Theology Part One: A world view is a fundamental cognitive orientation of a society or an individual that encompasses the entire breadth of the society or individual's knowledge and point-of-view.
Writing Strategies for Apologetics. It is normal for apologetics papers to take the form of an essay written in the third person. However, it is acceptable to use other useful formats, such as a dialog or a personal letter addressed to your interlocutor.
Alexis Hart from Henderson was looking for christian apologetics research paper Dane Armstrong found the answer to a search query christian apologetics research paper.
christian apologetics research paper. En este espacio podras expresarte y dejar tus propuestas relacionadas a las Lineas de Accion Estrategicas. 1 mensaje • Página 1 de 1. DavinPl Mensajes: Registrado: Jue Sep 13, pm. christian apologetics research paper.
An Introduction to Christian Apologetics. benjaminpohle.com – the website of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, which represents the work of one individual.
Contains useful papers on the nature and practice of apologetics as well as specific questions. Contains useful papers on the nature and practice of apologetics as well. Apologetics Study Bible for Students, Trade Paper [Dr.
Sean McDowell, Holman Bible Staff] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Like the acclaimed Apologetics Study Bible that has sold , + copies, the Apologetics Study Bible for Students will anchor younger Christians in the truths of Scripture by equipping them with thoughtful and practical responses for whenever the core Reviews: