This should be a place for constructive conversation. Also in the cause of clarity: I did not say that the Sagan quote is a defense of theism.
Traditional folktales never were. There are some good guys. There are some bad guys. The good guys win. The good guys are usually scrappy amateurs; the bad guys usually well-organized professionals with typical fascist precision.
The good guys usually demonstrate a respect for human life and the bonds of friendship; the bad guys betray their citizens and their underlings with equal abandon. They gain their good guy or bad guy status by either following the universal law, or breaking it.
Neither the Greeks nor Trojans are especially good nor villainous. The Trojans lose some points for kidnapping a woman, but the Greeks lose some points for killing and enslaving an entire city.
Neither side is scrappier or more professional than the other. Neither seems to treat civilians better or demonstrate more loyalty. Nor was it on the mind of the authors of Mahabharata, the Norse sagas, Jack and the Beanstalk, et cetera.
The article concludes this is because of nationalism. Nation-states wanted their soldiers to imagine themselves as fighting on the side of good, against innately-evil cartoon-villain enemies.
This was so compelling a vision that it shaped culture from then on: A Global History of Concentration Campsabout the rise of the idea that people on opposite sides of conflicts have different moral qualities, she told me: In short, we are rehearsing the idea that moral qualities belong to categories of people rather than individuals.
What are we to think of this? Robin Hood started stealing from the rich to give to the poor as early as the edition of his tale. The Mayan Hero Twins? Are there any differences between the way ancients and moderns looked at this?
Maybe modern stories seem more likely to have two clear sides eg made up of multiple different people separated by moral character.
Villains as opposed to monsters, or beings that are evil by their very nature seem more modern. So does the idea of heroes as necessarily scrappy, and villains as necessarily well-organized. And just eyeballing it, modern stories seem to use this plot a lot more, and to have less deviation from the formula.Are you interested in making food tastier, healthier, and more nutritious?
Then consider a career as a food scientist, which requires a good amount of formal education. In this total guide to graduate school personal statement examples, we’ll discuss why you need a personal statement for grad school and what makes a good one.
Then we’ll provide three graduate school personal statement samples from our grad school experts. She is interested in food science, food service, and nutrition education, and would like to implement nutrition education classes in a local school district.
She hopes to combine her knowledge in nutrition, culinary art, food science, and education to develop a school program that teaches nutrition fundamentals inside the classroom and prepares students to make healthy choices in school and at home.
Oct 21, · When Women Stopped Coding: Planet Money For decades, the share of women majoring in computer science was rising.
Then, in the s, something changed. Supplement A: Additional quotes. Chrysostom (); from sections 2 & 3 of his 3rd sermon on Lazarus: And with good cause He calleth the Scriptures “a door,” for they bring us to God, and open to us the knowledge of God, they make the sheep, they guard them, and .
A toolbox for analysing political texts. Discourse analysis is a useful tool for studying the political meanings that inform written and spoken text.
In other posts, I have provided a quick video introduction to the topic, and have discussed the ideas behind discourse theory, the main questions that students and researchers will likely ask as they set up their discourse analysis project, and.